ANONYMOUS HAS NO POSITIVE SOCIAL VALUE
Aside from flattering the egos of Professional Anti-Scientologist Tory Magoo (see below) and other “Old Guard” Anti-Scientologists, Anonymous has not really accomplished anything with their hate–based band wagon.
Their original issues have been so clouded up by sensationalistic conspiracy theory and unreliable apostate testimony that it’s nearly impossible for the public to even relate to Anonymous.
Their attempts to take their Internet gossip to the streets is often met with hostility and resentment. People are increasingly put off by the masked protesters with their invasive use of video cameras and offensive “bull-baiting” comments:
The following incident is detailed in a previous post, and is one of the clearest examples of how Anonymous members trigger angry reactions with their leering video-cameras and creepy masks:
There are hundreds of such incidents as these, in which Anonymous provokes and videotapes heated responses in order to convince the public that they actually have a reason to protest (they don’t). They are manufacturing an enemy because there really isn’t one.
Tom Newton
ANONYMOUS HATE GROUP 
Did we just watch the same vids?In all cases the Scientologists involved were way out of line when they interfered with the camera and/or signs, and I couldn’t see evidence of anons doing anything to provoke attack, other than merely *being there* and is NOT what we on planet earth consider being ‘bullbaited’.More to the point, YOU don’t get to say whether someone has a reason to protest or not – sure you can have an OPINION, but it doesn’t change anything. I hear ‘freedom of speech’ and ‘right to protest’ are things held quite dear over in the good ol’ US of A. So, the mere fact that THEY feel they have a reason to protest, and do so within the confines of the law, then it’s just too bad if you disagree.Seriously dude, it’s okay to be wrong sometimes. Do you really want to waste your whole life in a frenzied dual against this ridiculous caricature of what you think anonymous is? I mean, really, if you don’t calm down you’re going to give yourself skin failure! 50 CC’s of fluffy kitten pictures…< HREF="http://www.cuteoverload.com/kittens/" REL="nofollow">STAT!<>
Tom, standing around and filming violent instigators isn’t bull baiting. This is bull baiting:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REr7XfoiKrs
<>No, that is “ambush journalism”.<>
^Not at all, if you look it’s the bull baiters that approached Mr Bunker. The fact they follow him afterwards show that they are the ones following him, not the other way round.
No it is not “ambush journalism”. It is just recording an event.
<>No, that is “ambush journalism”.<>It’s certainly an ambush but Mark isn’t the one doing the ambushing. The victims of ambush journalism certainly don’t ask questions like ‘did you take time off from beating your wife to come down here? Ambush journalists certainly doesn’t involve the journalist being pursued and being accused of child molestation.
Tom makes the argument Scientologists can’t control the actions they make when angry and will attack someone just for said the word ‘fuck’.So like wild animals Scientologists can’t be held responsible for their actions. I know tom won’t read the second paragraph because reading is far to hard for him so I think Tom is a nut job who is most likely a Scientologist who is ashamed of the fact. Scientologists should be held accountable for their own actions and not the people around them.
Hey Naknei: I think it’s too easy to just say he’s a nut-job, although I do think this is how he presents himself online whether he realizes it or not. I’ve been poking around here and at first it was like *hey this place is fiesty, must be something interesting going on*, even in a couple of days, I’m getting to think it’s just sad.If this guy is for real, then all I can say is WOW. It must suck being him. He’s totally set himself up to fail with this blog as his position is completely untenable (why you’d voluntarily adopt a straw-man as a position is beyond me, but anyhoo) and add to that an adversarial tone…is there little wonder people call him a “moron” or “retard” etc?Now I personally prefer that people attack content and not each other (which doesn’t really get anyone anywhere), but its something that you gotta expect on the internet especially if you act like a twat. Maybe he hasn’t put two-and-two together yet, or maybe he’s well aware and just really likes conflict. Whatever the reason…this is sad.
Tom is a character not a person, he could be the CEO of my workplace for all I care, Tom is still a nut.
My only objection is that being insane would essentially let him off the hook. I mean, you gotta cut the mentally ill some slack, ya know? Like, ethically and all that.Whoever the author is, they’re sane enough to construct this blog and contribute multiple daily posts – which is fortunate given the responses they provoke.
Just look what Anonymous is trying for months against Dr. Oliver Schaper. They fill threads against him on WWP and still have not been able to ruin his life. Anonymous is obsessed with certain people and will do whatever it takes to bring them down. Tom, you should really address this matter as they believe Ollie Schaper and you are the same person.
Just look what Anonymous is trying for months against Dr. Oliver Schaper. They fill threads against him on WWP and still have not been able to ruin his life. Anonymous is obsessed with certain people and will do whatever it takes to bring them down. Tom, you should really address this matter as they believe Ollie Schaper and you are the same person.
^Come on that’s not funny Tom.
“Just look what Anonymous is trying for months against Dr. Oliver Schaper. They fill threads against him on WWP and still have not been able to ruin his life. Anonymous is obsessed with certain people and will do whatever it takes to bring them down.Tom, you should really address this matter as they believe Ollie Schaper and you are the same person.“<>I can handle that.TN<>
People hate us? We’ve had constant positive media coverage in the UK, and over 9000 members of the public have come up to me to thank me for what I was doing and shake my hand.No one seems to be thanking you, Tom.